Friday 21st July 2017
Save Our Hospital ServicesPublic Meeting
On Friday July 21st 2017 the Save South Tyneside Hospital Campaign held an important public meeting at Brinkburn Community Centre. Over 160 people consisting of both staff and the general public came together to discuss the current first phase consultation that has been launched by the South Tyneside Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to downgrade 24-hour children's and young persons A&E, take away consultant maternity, the special care baby unit, acute stroke and inpatient obstetrics from South Tyneside - leaving only Sunderland Royal to provide these services for South Tyneside and Sunderland!
In her opening remarks Emma Lewell-Buck MP (South Shields) spoke about the imposition by the government of the Sustainability and Transformation Plans (STPs) in local areas. She said:
She suggested that the present consultation is the first phase to do exactly that at South Tyneside Hospital, stating:
Emma made clear that the Hospital Trust and South Tyneside CCG have asserted that the proposals being presented in the consultation have been formulated and supported by clinicians and staff at our Hospital. Yet many of the clinicians and staff at the hospital have contacted Emma and provided her with evidence to say that they have been actively blocked from participating in the review of clinical services, and have not been involved in formulating any of the proposals being consulted on. In response to this situation Emma asked:
Emma outlined her action to write to the Joint Health Scrutiny Committee in order to refer these matters to the Secretary of State. She concluded by speaking about the vital ongoing work of our campaign, and that she and the campaign will not rest in the fight to protect our hospital.
Marion Langley (Staff Side Chair and Unison Branch Secretary at the South Tyneside District Hospital) gave further testimony to indicate that hospital staff are not being listened to. She said that the information that is going out in the consultation documents and at the consultation events is stating that staff have been fully informed and that staff have put the proposals forward themselves. She said:
Marion said that some of the staff that were picked to be involved in preparing the review proposals are managers. But whilst some of these managers have clinical qualifications (E.g. as nurses or midwives), in some cases they have not practised for many years, and they have not worked in the relevant service on which they were advising. At the same time relevant clinicians and nurses have been excluded from the planning process, she said:
There are no minutes for the planning meetings and no transparency as to how these decisions have been made. Marion pointed out that in one case staff put forward an alternative option that was rejected at the '11th hour' without any feedback or dialogue so as to preclude any chance of developing that alternative. Marion said:
The present action of the unions is to involve staff in discussions so they can express their views to them. Unison will submit its response to this 'so-called' consultation.
Gemma Taylor (South Tyneside Public Service Alliance and Co-ordinator of Save South Tyneside Hospital Campaign) spoke about the many important issues that had been raised in the consultation including the lack of clinical involvement in devising the review options for consultation. Gemma said:
Gemma concluded by saying:
Roger Nettleship (Chair of SSTHC) remarked that all of us (whatever our status) have a claim on the economy such that it should meet our needs as a right. By contrast, the government presents our health, education, and most other public services as a cost and burden on the economy. Like education health care adds tremendous value to the economy. What is the economy for if it doesn't satisfy the need for public services, such as health and education at the highest standards?
Roger sent a message to those local leaders and those in health who are saying 'because this is financially driven by government cuts, there is nothing we can do, these are the only options and we have to accept them':
Firstly, if it is driven by government then it is not inevitable! Roger mentioned the recent success at South End, where the A&E has been saved from closure.
Secondly, in spite of the fact that service closures are being driven by massive cuts to the NHS budget, it has been admitted in the business plan that insignificant amounts of money will be saved by closing down acute services at South Tyneside. There are massive cuts to both hospitals totalling £35 million this year alone. How is closing South Tyneside Hospital acute services going to deal with the financial situation? The other main issue given for service closures is shortage of clinical specialists, doctors and nurses, but closing our hospital will not solve these problems in recruitment. There is no coherent government or NHS plan to train more specialists and nurses. This has been going on for 20-30 years. There is not a district hospital in the country that would not close if you imposed national standards on staffing and stopped agency staff.
There is no public authority trying to solve any of the real problems in the NHS. The proper funding of the NHS is the responsibility of government and public authorities, not a commercial market decision behind closed doors of independent commissioners and providers trying to make ends meet. Insufficient training of doctors and nurses is not being addressed and is in-fact being made worse.
The issue for health workers and concerned people everywhere is that we have to take control of this situation ourselves. We know it is not just about our health services in this region, NHS England, NHS Improvement, etc. - these now shadowy organisations - would like to use South Tyneside as an example (a model) to roll out cut backs to acute services all over the North East. Lets instead become a model to fight to safeguard the NHS in South Tyneside and Sunderland. It is our hospital, our NHS and our workplace.
Stephen Hepburn MP (Jarrow) was the final speaker and summed up making some overviews. He said it was inspirational to see so many people at the meeting. He commended all those who are fighting to save the hospital. He praised the NHS trade unions and their fight to maintain services while the present government cut wages every year.
In response to health service budget cuts (exampling the Jarrow Walk-In Centre closure, and the transfer of services from South Tyneside to Sunderland) he said:
He concluded by saying:
Opening Speeches from the Panel
- Public Meetings
- 'Path to Excellence' Consultation Responses
- STP Responses
- Marches and Demonstrations
- Celebrations and Other Events
- Lectures and Workshops
- News and Articles from 2017
- News and Articles from 2016
- Protests Against Maternity and SCBU Closure
- March and Rally 2017
- Public Meeting - September 2017
- Joint Health Scrutiny Committee
- Response to Consultation
- Naylor Report
- May Day Rally
- National Demo for #ourNHS
- North East March and Rally for #ourNHS
- KONP Campaign Workshop
- Response to STP
- Call to Publish STP Plans
- SSTHC Supports Footprints March
- First March to Defend Our Hospital and NHS
- Jarrow March 80th Anniversary
- Public Meeting